Hi,
What about the support of db like Couchbase (http://www.couchbase.com/) or OrientDB (http://www.orientdb.org) ?
How hard it is trying to adapt dhtmlxConnector to support one of these ?
Hi,
What about the support of db like Couchbase (http://www.couchbase.com/) or OrientDB (http://www.orientdb.org) ?
How hard it is trying to adapt dhtmlxConnector to support one of these ?
Connector is created to automate sql generation for common CRUD operations, in case of no-SQL DB - server side is less complex and in many cases implementation without connector will be more clear and simple than ones with connector, so there is no much sense in no-sql connectors.
If i well understood, dhtmlxConnector is not useful when a nosql db is used, so instead of customizing dhtmlxConnector for nosql db, we should directly use our own code for that, am i right ?
What about the integration with DataProcessor ? Is there some documentation resources to achieve that or do we have to look into the dhtmlxConnector code to search how it’s done ?
we should directly use our own code for that, am i right ?
yep
Actually, instead of dataprocessor you can attach custom js code to events and use fully custom logic.
As for dataprocessor - check
docs.dhtmlx.com/doku.php?id=dhtm … gprinciple
lol, the one relying on nosql will lose all dhtmlx main advantages
I suppose we have to replace global storage by our own code too ?
Except nosql, do you support a clustered rdbms ? which one ?
Only connector functionality will be lost.
Components are client side, and do not depend on server side code.
Actually in case of json based databases, like mongodb - it possible to load json data from db in component without any extra transformation, so it not so bad for noSQL users.
Yes, Couchbase is also a json based database.
Maybe a tutorial one day may fit the situation and shows how dhtmlx can be use in a nosql approach too.