Problem with dhtmlscheduler_mobile.js and touchui.js

Discontinued products DHTMLX Touch
#1

Hello:

I am developing a program with several views using the dhtmlx framework, my html is this:

[code]

	<script src="codebase/dhtmlxscheduler_mobile.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

<style>

</style>
	
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="codebase/dhtmlxscheduler_mobile.css">
	<!-- <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/prueba.css"> -->
	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/agenda_clinica.css">
	
	
</head>
<body>
<div class="body">
	
	<script src="multiview.js" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>
			
	</div>
</body>[/code]

as you can see, I am using dhtmlx_schedulermobile.js, and it works, but i have a pair of little problems

In my custom views I have a right gray bar, and i cant take it away. If I use

instead of dhtmlx_schedulermobile.js, the bar dissapear, but some methods stop working. If I set a widht : 100% in the view, then the text fields dont accept text in the android browser (works fine with chrome, but i want it in android)

And now Im trying to do another view with a carrousel, and It looks like the js dont like it

I looked in the forum for the solution, but it looks like nobody have this problem :frowning:

Thanks a lot for reading and helping

#2

Please try to use the attached js file
It is includes full dhtmlx touch - so all components must work correctly.

If issue still occurs - please provide any kind of sample or demo link where issue can be reconstructed.
codebase_debug.zip (83.6 KB)
codebase_compressed.zip (50.4 KB)

#3

Thanks so much, this fixed my problem with the textbox, but it gives a problem

"Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method ‘valueOf’ of undefined
in dhtmlxscheduler_mobile.js:243

I attack a js where you can see the problem with the grey bar and the default dhtmlxscheduler_mobile.js, and is fixed with the new, but some functions like the valueOf dont work now

Thanks for this fast help Stanislav, you rules!
ejemplo.rar (1.36 KB)

#4

We have not reproduced the problem locally. We have attached the sample we tested. Please check.

if the problem is not solved, please attach the complete demo
ejemplo.zip (53.8 KB)